ANSI A1–A9 vs EN 388: Cut Resistant Gloves Levels Compared — Lab Data & How to Choose
Share
Quick Recommendation:For general work and light assembly, ANSI A3–A5 (≥1,000–2,200g cut force) gives the best protection-to-dexterity balance. For heavy sheet metal, glass, or metal fabrication, step up to A6–A9 (≥3,000g). Note: ANSI/ISEA 105 (North America) and EN 388 (Europe) are not interchangeable — always match the rating to your region and task.
Two competing scales — ANSI's A1–A9 and EN 388's numbers/letters — both describe cut resistance, yet they are tested and graded differently, which is why the same glove can look "A5" on one tag and "4X43F" on another. This guide compares them side by side with the actual force thresholds and gives you a task-based selection matrix, so you pick the right level without guesswork.
1. The two standards at a glance
ANSI/ISEA 105 is the U.S. standard for hand protection. It grades cut resistance on a scale of A1 (lowest) to A9 (highest), based on the force (in grams) required to cut through the material in the ASTM F2992-15 test.
EN 388 is the European standard. It reports cut resistance in two places — a Coup test index (1–5) and, when the material is too cut-resistant for the Coup test, a TDM straight-blade letter rating (A–F).
The two scales measure different physical quantities, so they cannot be converted 1-to-1. The table below aligns them by risk tier instead.
2. Cut resistant Gloves thresholds, side by side
Below are the official grading thresholds from each standard, grouped by the level of hand hazard they are designed for.
| Risk tier | ANSI/ISEA 105 level & force | EN 388 TDM force | EN 388 Coup index | Typical applications |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Light | A1 ≥200g · A2 ≥500g · A3 ≥1,000g | A (2N) · B (5N) · C (10N) | 1 (1.2) · 2 (2.5) · 3 (5) | Paper, packaging, light assembly, food prep (soft), textile cutting |
| Medium | A4 ≥1,500g · A5 ≥2,200g · A6 ≥3,000g | D (15N) · E (22N) | 4 (10) · 5 (20) | Auto repair, sheet-metal handling, glass production, leatherwork |
| Heavy | A7 ≥4,000g · A8 ≥5,000g · A9 ≥6,000g | F (30N and above) | — (Coup test not applicable) | Steel mill, fiberglass, aerospace cutting, ordnance disposal |
3. Choose your level by task
Light cut risk — ANSI A1–A3
Office document handling, light industrial assembly (thin metal/plastic), food processing of soft ingredients, light textile cutting, and simple woodworking. Tools are blunt or low-force.
Medium cut risk — ANSI A4–A6
Automotive repair (metal parts), metal product manufacturing (sheet cutting), glass production (cutting/handling), and leatherworking with thick hides. Sharp edges with moderate cutting force.
Heavy cut risk — ANSI A7–A9
Heavy machinery manufacturing, steel mill work (high-intensity metal cutting, hot steel), fiberglass production, aerospace precision cutting, and military ordnance disposal. Sharp or hard objects and complex hazards.
4. Watch a cut test
5. Download the PPE Selection Matrix
For plant safety managers, we've compiled a one-page selection matrix mapping job roles to the recommended cut level and coating. Download the PDF and share it with your team.
6. Frequently asked questions
Are ANSI/ISEA 105 and EN 388 ratings directly comparable? +
No. EN 388 and ANSI/ISEA 105 measure different quantities under different test methods, so they cannot be compared 1-to-1. Group them by risk tier instead (see the table above).
Which standard should I follow for selecting gloves? +
It depends on your region. EN 388 is standard in Europe and many other markets, while ANSI/ISEA 105 is used in North America. Most gloves sold in the U.S. carry both markings. Match the rating to your local regulations and the specific cut hazard.
Does a higher level always mean better? +
Not necessarily. A9 offers the most cut protection but typically trades away some dexterity and tactile sensitivity. For fine assembly you may prefer A4–A5, which protect adequately while keeping fingertip feel. Match the level to the hazard, not "the highest number."